Moscow appeared a real "hot spot". Second day in South Butovo not subside opposition of the Moscow authorities and local residents who refuse to give demolished their homes and move to high-rises. Situation interested members of the Public Chamber and the State Duma. Some MPs have threatened to begin a parliamentary investigation of why the Moscow authorities violated the rights of citizens in the interest of developers. If the city authorities to retreat under the joint pressure of local residents and politicians, it could become a precedent for subsequent attempts to defend the ownership of land in Moscow. Litigation over land between Butovskii residents and the municipality does not last the first year. At first, officials refused to register the land under private ownership homes residents. Now there is a court decision, under which residents are evicted from their wooden homes in high-rises. The Earth, by the court belongs to the city. Refractory butovtsev ready to settle in one-or two-bedroom apartment on the street Kadyrov. The name of the street - as fraternal greetings from the distant Chechnya. And this analogy is surprisingly relevant June 19, when in a quiet neighborhood Moscow OMON fighters actually begun a special operation. Together with bailiffs they tried to storm a private house. As the witnesses, Building 8 on the street Kadyrov - this is the most extreme corner of the neighborhood Butovo, which is directly adjacent to the village Scherbinka, that is situated on the border of the Moscow region. The family Prokofiev stands first on the list for demolition around the village of South Butovo. According to the plans of the city government by 2010, there should appear a new neighborhood, however, as noted by residents Butova, the plan, no one in the eye saw. Relocation of houses with land in high-rises arranged only 15 families out of 80. Others did not agree to it. Including Prokofiev, who had barricaded themselves in his possession. Living Butova formed a human chain and protect the house from the bulldozers. They do not exclude that the evening of June 20 or at night the authorities once again will try to demolish the private family home Prokofiev. Outside Bogucharsky tent camp and erected barricades. Villagers Butovo not intend to leave office. Several dozen people made a fire and made a duty roster on the site. House, who stormed the riot police, took the five-hectare plot, but the homes there a little, two-thirds of the village - a good, modern houses with amenities - told RBC daily eyewitness who is familiar with the situation inside. - They will not break their home, they were in possession of all documents, and also have first claim on the privatization of land. They want to be evicted or at home with land or compensate them for the land at market value. " The official told RBC daily, if the authorities in Moscow still retreat and create a precedent for conservation land under the houses decorated in the property, it would be "explosive" value for all deportees of Muscovites, who also would not give the land to the authorities. Moscow authorities say met all its obligations to residents of the village of South Butovo, the first deputy mayor Yuri Roslyak. According to him, in Russia and in Moscow there are laws which determine the actions of the parties by changing the landowner. Mr. Roslyak explained that many areas in the settlement were not even formalized, and the rest were not used as a dwelling, but as the summer. Events in Butovo already attracted the attention of politicians and public figures. On the morning of June 19 at the scene visited the Communist Party activists, AKM and NBP, some of whom were detained by riot police. Chairman of the Public Chamber on public control over the activities of law enforcement agencies, security agencies and reforming the judicial system, Anatoly Kucherena arrived June 19 to residents of the neighborhood. "We believe that everything that happened - this tyranny, - is assured by counsel. - People should not have been submitted to any court decision, it was only available to the prefect, on the basis of which tried to evict them." According to Mr. Kucherena, the Public Chamber intends to establish a special team to thoroughly investigate the situation. The lawyer said he is ready to assist residents of South Butovo "all necessary assistance in collecting and preparing the documents for circulation to the prosecutor and the court. In the State Duma may initiate a parliamentary investigation into the situation in Moscow, on the basis of developments in South Butovo. Told the coordinator sectarian association "Our capital" Alexander Lebedev, known for his uncompromising stance towards the Moscow authorities. He also came to the inhabitants of the neighborhood on June 20. According to the deputy, "cleanup" of indigenous peoples in South Butovo in the interests of developers is a violation of their constitutional rights to adequate housing. "Decisions of the court, of course we must respect - stressed the MP. - But on the other hand, a recent test of the Accounting Chamber found that the Moscow court against the law and the Constitution are funded by the city authorities. In this situation, people who are with them in a legal conflict, should have right to justice in other instances. According to the MP, such conflict situations in the city of thousands, and to find out who is behind all these cases. "It's no secret that the construction business in Moscow by close relatives affiliated with top officials of the city. This is an ugly public-private partnership will cripple the capital of the family and has already put the city on the brink of man-made disaster," - he stressed. According to Mr. Lebedev, the law on parliamentary inquiry is, at least two reasons, because of which you can proceed Butovskii events. This is a "massive violation of civil rights and the threat of man-made disaster." Members of the group "Our capital" is going to the next plenary week to start collecting signatures for the appropriate treatment. Experts estimate the situation more calmly. "In the formal-legal aspect, the eviction could be taken even against the owners of houses and land. There is a rule (st.239 CCS) on the alienation of immovable property in connection with the taking of land on which it is" - said RBC daily in an interview with the company lawyer "Grigoryev & Partners Konstantin Afanasyev. According to him, interested persons have the right to challenge the appropriate judicial act in accordance with the procedural rules, including the belief that accommodation provided instead, disproportionately to the fact that they were deprived. As for the actions of bailiffs, they can also be filed a complaint in the manner prescribed by federal law "On Enforcement Proceedings", said Mr. Afanasiev. Residents of demolished houses complain that they still did not show for a court decision on the demolition, and claim that they had no orders for new apartments. However, experts do not see this as a violation of the law. "Order in a document-base for the Universe as a dwelling the Housing Code is not provided. When it comes to addressing the relevant local government authority for the dwelling, its in this case should not replace the court's decision, which, inter alia, should be specified period of the contract residential lease ", - said Konstantin Afanasyev. In his view, the interests of developers, of course, take precedence over the interests of residents, especially in the eyes of local and municipal authorities, who are interested in the flow of funds from developers. On the balanced interests of the private-owned tenants and the public, expressed by the authorities, and should be directed to the current legislation, concluded the expert.
|