The main interest, which fought the deputies of the previous convocation, continue. So in any case, says the head of department of housing policy Peter Saprykin - by law. For example, the right to save when moving to a new residence the former district of residence.

Moreover, in order to avoid devious traps from investors in this law is given a new comprehensive definition of a small country: `... the area of residence - area bounded by one or more of the surrounding areas within the administrative district of Moscow, familiar to everyday life '. Sami MPs dubbed the document `housing` constitution. He really organize all existing housing in Moscow standards, of course, subject to the Housing Code. The main feature of this set of rules is that it painted on items not only the rights of immigrants, both owners and tenants, but the whole scenario of migration (who, under what conditions and in what sequence should act), as well as options compensation. According Saprykina, unambiguous wording of the articles of this law will not allow, as before, abusing the rights of Muscovites to housing: unless, of course, they udosuzhatsya acquainted with this 'constitution' housing.

For example, owners of apartments in the relocation to a new residence if desired can be obtained from the city paid for the apartment at market price. These services appraiser, by law, must pay the owners of apartments do not, and those who implement the resettlement: that is, the investor. However, there is one `but`: if migrants feel that they underestimated the square meters, the re-evaluation have already been paid out of pocket.

Interprets the law and other important housing nuances. For example, many Muscovites sure: if the investor to replace the old apartment gives the owner a new housing more footage for the lack of equal value, then the migrant is forced to pay extra square meters on the market value. Even if he does not need more. But the law says otherwise. Indeed, if the owner of personal choice wants to get an apartment when moving more and more expensive, he pays extra for extra `squares' at market price (article 11). But if in compensation for lost property owner provide a flat, whose market value above the old one, if he can not provide an alternative, supplement with him not charged. With one caveat: in the new apartment rooms as much as it was in the old.

However, it was discovered and rather controversial article, which is unlikely to please the Muscovites. For example, the city prosecutor's office to be precarious, article 8 of discharge the obligations of the parties during the liberation of the dwelling. Prosecutors believe that it does not guarantee the right of members of the family home owners, if instead of the new apartments they have a monetary compensation.

Gives cause for concern and another article - in Article 3, a new, not 'shabby' basis for resettlement: the house can be demolished, not only because of their dilapidated, but if it will be necessary in their place, new construction and development of territories. It is this point has caused a sharp reaction from a number of metropolitan members. However, Peter Saprykin, referring to the Housing Code, found such an interpretation is appropriate. So remove the house along with the land on which it stands, the law allows. However, only if the owners of the apartment building did not take time to formalize ownership of the land on which it stands.